(explanation for those who've not seen - I started the week posting occasional comments around and about under the name 'Invisible Blue Witch', but, after posting here yesterday, changed it to 'Semi-Invisible Blue Witch)
"I'm sure someone once said something about people writing in the past because they had something to say and people writing nowadays to find out whether or not they've got anything to say. There's probably something in that. "
"Hmmm," I thought, "I was at home on Monday and didn't see that article, how strange." So I clicked your link and remembered that I'd just flicked straight past it... as you said, yawn... enough of these.... how often do we blog about the raison d'etre of newspapers? Eh?
Exactly, we wouldn't bother...
drD - I had a mental list of four people who I thought might guess my phrase. After Vaughan guessed it, two of my list have proved me correct :) The other 2 haven't commented. One of them is currently away.
Which one do you think I'm referring to?
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 7:44 PMthe bit about psychiatry?
Posted by e on 21 April, 2004 at 9:13 PMNo.
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 9:15 PM"It is not like I have invented a new personality, but I did let go"?
Posted by Semi-Blue Invisible Stranger on 21 April, 2004 at 9:18 PMNo Nigel, but I love your hiated name :)
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 9:28 PM(explanation for those who've not seen - I started the week posting occasional comments around and about under the name 'Invisible Blue Witch', but, after posting here yesterday, changed it to 'Semi-Invisible Blue Witch)
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 9:30 PMI dunno if I got it, but I like this one.....
"I'm sure someone once said something about people writing in the past because they had something to say and people writing nowadays to find out whether or not they've got anything to say. There's probably something in that. "
Posted by Jen on 21 April, 2004 at 9:42 PMI liked that one too Jen.
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 9:45 PMNot my favourite though.
"Blogging is slightly addictive, but so is wanking."
???
OK, maybe not.
Posted by Vaughan on 21 April, 2004 at 10:23 PMYes Vaughan, it was ;)
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 10:26 PM.... the answer I was referring to, I meant by that. Of course ;)
Posted by Blue Witch on 21 April, 2004 at 10:29 PMYou mean blogging could become a habit?
Posted by Lynn on 21 April, 2004 at 10:34 PMPerish the thought.
*whistles nonchalantly* Addicted? Me? Ridiculous!
Posted by e on 21 April, 2004 at 11:10 PMDamn.. Vaughan got there before I did.
Posted by Alan on 22 April, 2004 at 7:45 AM"Hmmm," I thought, "I was at home on Monday and didn't see that article, how strange." So I clicked your link and remembered that I'd just flicked straight past it... as you said, yawn... enough of these.... how often do we blog about the raison d'etre of newspapers? Eh?
Posted by NiC on 22 April, 2004 at 7:56 AMExactly, we wouldn't bother...
I was going to say that blogging is nowhere near as addictive as....the other thing
*comes over uncharacteristically bashful*
Posted by Ray on 22 April, 2004 at 8:17 AMs'funny that - I saw that phrase and thought of you BW
Posted by drD on 22 April, 2004 at 9:42 AM*books in for therapy*
I blog more than I wank, then again I wouldn't let someone else write my blog for me whereas...
Did I say that out loud? Damn!
Shouldn't you be Translucent Witch?
Posted by Little Miss Verte on 22 April, 2004 at 9:43 AMdrD - I had a mental list of four people who I thought might guess my phrase. After Vaughan guessed it, two of my list have proved me correct :) The other 2 haven't commented. One of them is currently away.
LMV - translucent = transparent. I think not :)
Posted by Blue Witch on 22 April, 2004 at 9:50 AMBoth of them make you go blind.
Posted by Nigel on 22 April, 2004 at 12:59 PM